Trusted Criminal Defence Lawyers!

Criminal law addresses crimes that occur within a nation and disrupt its peace and order. With the help of Criminal law, what is considered a threat and harm has been elaborately defined. The criminal laws that we see in place todayhave all been established by statute. Criminal law is distinct from civil law. In criminal law the focus is on giving punishment and rehabilitation to convicted felons, whereas in civil law, emphasis is more on dispute resolution and victim compensation.

Getting charged with a crime is one of the worst fears of anybody. During this crucial time, if you do not seek the legal expertise of a professional criminal lawyer, your chances of freedom will be hanging by a thread. A criminal lawyer will always be well versed in complex criminal statutes, which can be used to ensure a fair trial. The defence strategies they will develop will help you to protect your rights against potential abuse and alsonegotiate plea deals.

‘Intent,’ ‘application of force,’ and ‘lack of consent’—these are the three elements that must be met to establish a charge of assault in Canada. According to the Criminal Code of Canada, even a slight touch executed in a hostile manner can be considered assault. For example, spitting on someone may not be physically harmful, but if the intent behind it is hostile or offensive, it will be labelled as assault. Another example is someone grabbing the arm of another person in the middle of a heated argument. Here, the force involved is minimal but still qualifies as assault because it was done without consent and involves an intentional application of force.

In the Canadian legal system, ‘reasonable doubt’ is understood as the level of certainty a judge or jury must have regarding the evidence presented. This standard of proof is required in criminal trials to secure a conviction. It means that if the evidence presented by the prosecution does not convince the jury or judge of the accused’s guilt ‘beyond a reasonable doubt,’ the accused must be released. This standard is rooted in the ‘presumption of innocence,’ ensuring that no one is wrongfully convicted and affirming that the burden of proof lies with the prosecution.Now if there is any sort of ‘reasonable doubt,’ then it must show reasoning, common sense, and undeniable connection with theevidence in hand.

We all know that police interrogation can be extremely intimidating. Police officers ask a series of related and unrelated questions; sometimes they repeatthe same questions in different ways, which can cause confusion and lead you to say things that will eventually backfire at you. This is why you should know about the several fundamental rights that have been established to ensure fair treatment under the law.

These are as follows:

• Right to remain silent
• Right to legal counsel
• Right to be Informed of the Charges
• Right to Avoid Detention
• Right tobe treated with dignity and respect

Canada’s bail legislation is designed to ensure that all individuals, whether wrongly accused of a crime or identified as a true suspect, have the opportunity to prove their innocence before being proven guilty. This means no one can be unnecessarily detained before their trial. Everyone has a right to bail, but certain conditions must be met. The primary consideration is whether the offender poses a risk to public safety or is likely to flee. Additionally, before granting bail, the court assesses the nature of the offence and the accused’s criminal history. Police can also enforce bail conditions like regular check-ins, travel restrictions, or financial guarantees.

For a charge of impaired driving, several defences are available in Canada. These include challenging the legality of the arrest or the police procedures, such as any violations of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms during the arrest. Defences can also focus on the reliability of evidence, including the accuracy and timeliness of breathalyzer tests. If there were procedural errors or if the equipment was faulty or improperly used, these could be grounds to question the test results. Moreover, if a police officer lacked probable cause for the traffic stop, this might also provide a viable defence. These defences require a thorough review by experienced legal counsel to effectively leverage them in court.